
Photo: Fish & Game
I hate this topic with a passion. Mostly because I’m tired of all the misinformed screeching, frothing emotive bullshit coming out of the orifices of many, not all, but many of the anti 1080 brigade, and at times the pro 1080 advocates as well.
The issue is divisive, especially on social media and forums and more often than not results in a screaming contest that is likened to playing chess with a pigeon: it knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board then struts around like it won anyway. The likes of the depressing deer carcass cuddling duo the Graf brothers have dedicated wasted many year on their crusade to ban 1080, or Sodium fluoroacetate. Emotionally charged arguments and cherry picked ‘scientific evidence’ from both sides has ensured the certainty that the debate will rage on for the foreseeable future as it goes around in circles with the same rhetoric being regurgitated over and over.

1080 as it currently stands, is our only effective (both in terms of cost, ease of distribution) method control that we have until a more effective tool is developed. It is not an intended effort to eradicate, that is unrealistic and is often used as a straw man argument against 1080 as being ineffective. The argument over trapping has been done to death, it is expensive and logistically impossible on the same scale as the terrain that aerial 1080 application can cover. One of the Graf boys even suggested to me years ago in the comments of one of their Youtube videos that if we left possums alone they would reach their own natural balance and wouldn’t need to be poisoned. One doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to spot the flaws in that stance, and there is no science to back up that this would be achieved without the destruction of many of our native flora and fauna first….which is what I thought we were trying to avoid?
The current National Government has set an ambitious, perhaps even impossible target to be pest free by the year 2050. This will not happen with 1080…for any species…or with any other method for that matter unless research into the viability of biological control methods that disappeared off the radar are once again put back on the table, and we change our views on genetic engineering and accept that we need to move into modern times and use biology and science to solve the problem, not indiscriminate toxins.

We are far better served uniting to drive the agenda for a solution, rather than drowning it out with the noise of the anti 1080 screeching movement. It’s tired, it’s boring, and nobody is listening except for like minded people. That’s the part that most don’t seem to understand.
Finding a viable alternative will effectively make 1080 redundant, making the drive to ban 1080 pointless but most importantly, unnecessary.
More ban 1080 petitions have been circulated in the past than I’ve had haircuts, and all they do is give the signatories a false perception they’ve had their say or made a difference.
As someone I saw mentioned earlier in the week: “starting a change.org petition to get something banned is akin to masturbating to get a baby, neither produce a result.”